Safe Third Country Agreement Supreme Court


As part of the pact, which remains in force because the court has suspended its decision to give Parliament time to weigh, asylum seekers arriving in a formal Canada-U.S. The crossing point is blocked and asked to apply for asylum in the first country where they arrived. Federal Judge Ann Marie McDonald ruled that the agreement violated part of the Canadian Charter of Rights that states that laws or actions of the state that encroached on life, liberty and security must be consistent with the principles of fundamental justice. Refugee lawyers who had been turned back at the Canadian border questioned the pact and said the United States was not considered “safe” under President Donald Trump. McDonald gave the government until the end of January to prepare for the break of the agreement because it understood that it was in the public interest not to terminate the agreement immediately. As of February 2017, more and more refugees have begun to cross the Canadian border at locations other than official border checkpoints. To avoid the effects of the agreement, all refugees at a border crossing would be automatically repatriated to the United States, in accordance with the CAB provisions. [24] Since it is not illegal to cross the border outside a port of entry under the Immigration and Refugee Act or the rules associated with it, as long as the person immediately reports to a Canada Border Services Agency official and st.c.a. does not apply to rights outside a port of entry, these are persons who otherwise are not entitled to assert their rights after an irregular crossing.

possible. [25] In some cases, these refugees have been amputated by frostbite[23] and concerns have been expressed that some refugees may freeze to death while crossing the border. [26] The agreement allowing any country to reject asylum seekers attempting to apply for refugees at official border crossings was declared unconstitutional by the Federal Court of Justice in July. By accepting the government`s request, the court maintains the status quo at the border, which means that asylum seekers will continue to be returned to the United States. In order to put an end to this “forum shopping” under the STCA and its Canadian legislation that is able to make it possible, asylum seekers generally must apply for asylum in the first “safe” country in which they enter. Under Section 159.3 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, the United States is considered a “safe” country under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). [5] But the increase in refugee applications took place while the Safe Third Country Agreement was in force. Since the agreement allows the government to deport asylum seekers who attempt to enter official ports of entry, future refugees who do not meet specific exceptions under the agreement, such as. B a family member living in Canada, must find other ways to cross the border if they wish to apply for refugees in Canada. Under the agreement, refugee claimants must apply in the first country they arrive between the United States or Canada, unless they are entitled to a waiver. For example, asylum seekers who are citizens of a country other than the United States and who arrive from the United States at the land border between Canada and the United States can only assert their rights to refugees in Canada if they fulfill an exception under the Safe Third Country Agreement.